Humble Exclusivism: Solusi Wacana Etis Otoritas Keagamaan di Ruang Digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24235/zyz44e53Keywords:
Humble Exclusivism, Digital Religious Authority, Islamic EthicsAbstract
The digitalization of religious authority faces a moral and epistemic crisis driven by social media's algorithmic logic, which favors performative popularity over institutional knowledge. This research aims to formulate "Humble Exclusivism" as an Islamic ethical framework to address this tension. The study employs a qualitative-descriptive method with a library research approach, integrated within the Digital Islamic Studies framework. The findings demonstrate that humble exclusivism functions as an ethical paradigm emphasizing epistemic humility and moral accountability, thereby shifting legitimacy from algorithmic visibility back to the moral domain. The study concludes that this framework provides a viable model for contemporary authority, implying the need for digital da’wah to prioritize ethical responsibility over engagement metrics.
Downloads
References
Aulia, M. B. (2024). Metode Komunikasi Dakwah Ustadz Abi Azkakia Melalui Konten Live Streaming Video Game Online. In Program Studi Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab Dan Dakwah Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan.
Bell, D. (2007). Cyberculture. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosc195
Campbell, H. A. (2020). Digital Creatives and the Rethinking of Religious Authority. In Digital Creatives and the Rethinking of Religious Authority. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003045625
Ghozil Aulia, M., & Arif, M. (2025). The Urgency of Humility (Tawadhu’) in Moral Education: An Analysis of the Concept of Humility in Islam. IJRCS International Journal of Islamic Religion and Culture Studies, 3(1), 31–38. https://ijircs.com/
Grube, D. M. (2023). A Humble Exclusivism? In & E. van N.-V. B. Reitsma (Ed.), Religiously Exclusive, Socially Inclusive? : A Religious Response (pp. 25–42). Amsterdam University Press. https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/2228009/195189.pdf
Hasan, N. (2009). The making of public Islam: Piety, agency, and commodification on the landscape of the Indonesian public sphere. Contemporary Islam, 3(3), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-009-0096-9
Khaled Abou El Fadl. (2001). Speaking in God’s Name Islamic Law, Authority, and Women. In Oneworld Publications.
Najamudin, A. A. (2021). RITUAL KESALEHAN VIRTUAL DI MUSIM PANDEMI. JISA: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosiologi Agama, 4(2), 96–112.
Nur, D., Ibraya, N. S., & Marsuki, N. R. (2024). Dampak Sosiologi Digital Terhadap Perubahan Sosial Budaya Pada Masyarakat Masa Depan Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar interaksi sosial dan dinamika masyarakat . Berbagai perubahan khususnya dalam bidang. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(2), 123–135.
Prayitno, D. (2025). Bentuk-Bentuk Deotorisasi Hadis di Internet: Analisis Kontemporer terhadap Distorsi Otoritas Keilmuan dalam Ruang Digital. 4(2), 426–250.
Saenong, F. F., & Nisa, E. F. (2022). Relegitimizing Religious Authority : Indonesian Gender-Just Ulama Amid Covid-19. Religions, 13(May), 1–14.
Triantoro, D. A. (2020). Ustaz Youtube: Ustaz Abdul Somad and the Dynamics of Changing Religious Authorities. Penamas, 33(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v33i2.405
Wibowo, R. A., & Triadi, I. (2025). Fatwa Di Era Disrupsi Digital : Studi Tentang Otoritas Agama Dan Pengaruh Media Sosial Terhadap Penetapan Hukum Islam. 01(03), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33650/joki.v4i2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Religion and Social Transformation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
