The Effect Of Mnemonics Method On Students’ Vocabulary Achievement at MTS Annidhomiyah
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to found out the significant effect of using mnemonics method on students’ vocabulary achievement at Mts Annidhomiyah Japura Kidul. The method is intended for the english teacher to create a better method in teaching vocabulary. This Research used quaisi-experimental research by setting class of VIIIC as control class (using scientifict approach) and class VIIID as experimental class (using mnemonics method). In collecting the data, the researcher conducted pre-test and post-test, and in analyzing the data, the researcher used t-test. The findings shows the mean score of pre-test in experimental class was 42,12 and most of the students’ were belonged into very poor and poor category. Meanwhile at post-test, the mean score increased 70,76% into 28,56% and most of students’ were also belonged into very good category. However, the better improvement is occurred in experimental class. It was indicate by the result of the gain score of experimental class which was higher than control class (70,76% > 62,42%). Furthermore, the result of paired sample T-Test significance level was 0,00 which is lower then significance level of 0,05 (0,00 < 0,005) and accepted the Ha it means that there was a significant effect on students’ vocabulary achievement by using mnemonics method. Thus, it can be concluded that the use of mnemonics method is significantly improves students’ vocabulary achievement.
References
Anitah, Sri and Supriyati, yetti. 2008. Strategy pembelajaran di Sd, jakarta :Universitas Terbuka.
Celik, S. & Toptas, V. (2010). Vocabulary learning strategies of Turkish EFL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 62-71.
Creswell, John W. 2012. Education Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Edition). Boston: Pearson.
H.D, Brown. (2004). Language Assessment: Principle and Classroom Practices. New York: Longman, Pearson Education, p. 47.
Flynt, E. S., & Brozo, W. G. 2008. Developing academic language: Got words ? The Reading Teacher, 61, 500–502.
Fraenkel., Jack R., Wallen Norman N & Hyun H. Helen. 2012. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York : McGraw – Hill.
Hunt, N. (2010). Using mnemonics in teaching statistics. Teaching Statistics, 32(3), 73-75.
Hery Rahyubi (2012) . teori-teori belajar dan aplikasi pembelajaran motorik : Deskripsi dan tinjauna kritis majalengka :References.
https://www.panduan mengajar.com Accessed on 6th December 2018.
https://english.tutorvista.com/vocabulary.html Accessed on 05th march 2019.
https://cakheppy.wordpress.com/2011/04/01/strategi-belajar-mnemonic/ Accessed on 1st August, 2019.
Karen Markowitz & Eric Jensen, One Million Gigabyte Brain, Bandung, Kaifa, 2002.
Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2017). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective differentiated instruction. South Carolina: Pearson
Neuman, S. B., & Dwyer, J. (2009).Missing in action: Vocabulary instruction in pre-k. The Reading Teacher, 62(5), 384-392
Robson, D. (2011). Pimp my memory. New Scientist, 210(2806), 40-43.
Sugiyono. 2016. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Spackman, C. L. (2009). Mnemonics and Research on Using the Keyword Method in the Classroom.
White, Howard & Shagun Sabarwal. 2014. Quasi-experimental Design and Methods. Methodological Briefs: Impact Evaluation 8. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.
Zhang, L. J., & Anual, S. B. (2008). The role of vocabulary in reading comprehension: The case of secondary school students learning English in Singapore. RELC Journal, 39(1), 51-76
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Iis Khoirunnisa (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.