EFEKTIFITAS TUGAS MANDIRI BERBASIS INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY DALAM KEMAMPUAN MENULIS
Abstract
Tugas Mandiri or Independent assignments are an important element in implementing the learning process at the University. With the existence of information and communication technology, the opportunity to carry out independent tasks has become easier and more motivating. However, very few people talk about the forms or principles adopted in the independent assignment process so that their application becomes unclear. Jati (2021) reminds us that students are adept at using technology, but cannot yet learn with technology. ICT-based independent tasks have been patterned into an ICT task-based form. Many researchers suggest The principles and patterns of ICT-based independent assignments follow the Task-based pattern, while viewing language from a functional linguistic perspective, viewing technology as a process, and building independence that refers to three things; authentic exposure, the process of experience with technology and self-evaluation. Using a quasi-experimental design, this research aims to test the effectiveness of Task Based ICT in learning writing. The results of statistical calculations of the pre-test and post-test results for the experimental class and control class show that the independent assignment model using the ICT Task-Based principle has an influence in improving students' productive abilities (writing skills).
References
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Sorensen, C. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Cohen,L, Manion,L, & Marrison ,K. 2008. A guide to teaching practice. London : Routledge.
Cohen, A. D. (1994). Assessing language ability in the classroom, 2nd ed. Boston: Newbury House / Heinle & Heinle.
Floris, F. D. (2014). Using information and communication technology ( ict ) to enhance language teaching & learning. TEFLIN, 252(2), 139–146.
Celik, S., Arkin, E., & Sabriler, D. (2012). EFL Learnersí Use of ICT for Self-Regulated Learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 8(2), 98. Retrieved from https://acces.bibl.ulaval.ca/login?url=http://sfx.bibl.ulaval.ca:9003/sfx_local?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2015-09 18T11:21:35IST&url_ver=Z39.882004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.co.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA Pearson.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Farbrain, G., & Whinch. (1996). Reading, writing and reasoning. Houghton.
Hartfiel, Hughey, Wormuth, & Jacobs. (1985). Learning ESL composition. Newbur House Publisher, Inc.
Hidayati, H. K. ( 2018 ). Teaching writing to EFL learners: An Investigation of challenges.LANGKAWI.4(2).
Jacobs, H. L., Zinkraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. 1981. Testing ESL composition: A Practical Approach. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Farmer.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science. New York: Routledge.
Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Palfreyman, D. (2003). Introduction: culture and learner autonomy. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smiths(Eds), Learner autonomy across cultures, language education perspectives (pp. 1-23). New York:Palgrave Macmillian.
Richard, J. C. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge University Press.
Riset, K., & Tinggi, D. A. N. P. (2016). RISTEK DAN DIKTI NO 44 TAHUN 2015, (44).
Rouse, C. E., & Krueger, A. B. (2004). Putting computerized instruction to the test: a randomized evaluation of a “scientifically based” reading program. Economics of Education Review, 23(4), 323 e338
Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Secondlanguage learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 119–140). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
Thanasoulas, D. (2000). What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered? The Internet TESLJournal, 4 (11).
Watanabe, M., McLaughlin, T. F., Weber, K. P., & Shank, L. (2013). The Effects of Using Direct Instruction to Teach Coin Counting and Giving. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science Vol. 2 (1) , 150-159.
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Essex, UK: Longman.
Willis, J. (2012). A framework for task-based learning. Intrinsic Books E-books.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
